|
|
 |
|
> deutsch
> LÜ
2009
> LÜ
2008
> LÜ 2007
> LÜ 2006
> LÜ 2005
> Abwehr-Performance-Festival
> Imprint
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
* |
Last Inspection
The project Last Inspection
(Letzte Überprüfung) at Grenzwachturm Schlesischer Busch is
finished. From 2005 to 2009 the former
watchtower of th Berlin Wall was the
starting point for artistic examination with borders in the form of
site-specific, interventional, and situational presentations of
international artists. The project was
enjoying an increasing popularity among the Berlin people as well as
the tourists. Within the context of memorials and other places
reminding of the Berlin Wall and the time of division, the project
frames an outstanding and individual position, particularly by its
approach of applying artistic interventions to the linking of the past
with the present. Researches about the history of the watchtower and
the border section Schlesischer Busch are accompanying the programme.
|
**
|
History of the Führungsstelle
Schlesischer Busch
Am 9. November 1989 fiel die
Berliner Mauer und die
Grenzen der DDR öffneten sich. Ein Jahr später war die
Existenz der DDR
beendet. Aber bis heute ist die Berliner Mauer ein Symbol, einerseits
für den Kalten Krieg, der nicht nur Deutschland, sondern die ganze
Welt
in zwei Hälften spaltete und andererseits für den Zwang, den
die SED
(Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschland) auf ihre Bürger
ausübte. Die Geschichte der Berliner Mauer begann in der Nacht vom
12. zum 13.
August 1961. An der Grenze zwischen dem von der Sowjetunion und dem von
den West-Alliierten kontrollierten Teil Berlins errichteten
Volkspolizisten und Soldaten der Nationalen Volksarmee (NVA) eine
provisorische Mauer aus Stacheldraht und Betonklötzen (read on/pdf).
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
LÜ
2009
Sven Johne: Tears of the
Eyewitness
14.8. - 27.9.09
“Now let’s remember the night of 9 October 1989, the first major mass
demonstration in East Germany since 1953. 70,000 people are on the
inner ring road in Leipzig. Facing them are 8,000 policemen and
soldiers. The protesters are intimidated because the local SED
newspaper has threatened them with a so-called ‘Chinese solution’. But
the demonstration in Leipzig is the powerful beginning of the end of
the GDR. This demonstration was decisive for the downfall of the entire
Eastern bloc.”
We are in the middle of a professional television production. A
motivational speaker and an actor who is roughly 40 years old sit
across from each other, trying to come up with “emotional filling” for
a documentary about the fall of the Wall. This is the basic premise of
Sven Johne’s video work shown in the former watchtower in Schlesischer
Busch.
Sven Johne was born in Bergen on the island of Rügen in eastern
Germany. He studied photography under Timm Rautert at the Leipzig
Academy of Visual Arts until 2006. He has been living in Berlin since
2008. He relies on his own biography to explore one of the themes in his work:
the GDR and its
dissolution. |
|
The film Tears of
the Eyewitness was made especially for the watchtower in Schlesischer
Busch and is about the construction of memory. The goal of the
motivational speaker is to create “real emotions” in the actor and make
him cry. He tries to evoke the actor’s personal memories by taking him
back to the dramatic events of 1989 in Germany, especially in Leipzig.
He not only calls up images that are now part of the collective memory
but also refers to situations which are less well-known. The result is
an uneasy interplay between acted and real emotions that overcome the
viewers as well, even 20 years after the event.
Simultaneously to the exhibition in the watchtower, Sven Johne is also
participating with a film in the exhibition “Reconstructed Zone.
Aktuelle Kunst zur DDR und danach” (Reconstructed Zone. Contemporary
Art About and After the GDR) curated by Anne Kersten at the Kunstverein
Wolfsburg.
The exhibition in the watchtower was curated by Christine Heidemann and
Anne Kersten as part of the project Letzte Überprüfung by
Svenja Moor. With the friendly support of Kulturamt
Treptow-Köpenick. Thanks to Sammlung Kaufmann Berlin.
|
|

Sven
Johne: Sven Johne: Tears of the Eyewitness, 2009 (Video, 23 min., Engl.
mit dt. Untertiteln), Studioshot, © Sven Johne
Sven Johne „Tears of the Eyewitness" (2009, Video,
23 minutes, Engl. with German subtitles)
Actors: Chris Woltmann and Marco Albrecht
Camera/Light: Steve George Kfoury
Sound: Marcel Timm
Dolly Operator: Hagen Eltzsch/Julia Stöckmann
Make-up: Gülten Özcan-Tomm
Editing: Sven Voss
Review
of the exhibition on artnet.de
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Kinga Araya: Ten
Steps
5.6.–26.7.09
The exhibition entitled Ten Steps, by
Polish born and Canadian educated artist Kinga Araya, currently residing
in the United States, marks the twenty-year anniversary of her
defecting Poland in Florence, Italy and the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Araya walked the entire length of the Berlin Wall (160 km) with actual
and virtual walkers for ten consecutive days. Starting in the South,
above the Schoenefeld airport area on July 15, she proceeded
counter-clockwise, finishing in the same place on July 24th, 2008.
The exhibition will feature a video documentation of Performing Exile:
Walking the Wall performance, photographs and audio artworks that
relate to Araya’s artistic preoccupation of crossing borders and
dwelling in-between countries, cultures and languages. The video’s
creative narration that guides the moving images of the
walking
|
|
feet along
the Wall paths, and frequent readings of the maps,
communicates the importance of personal and historical narrative where
diverse voices and languages walk and talk along the trail.
Araya walked and recorded the conversations primarily in English and
German, but there are also sections of spoken Latvian, Polish, and
Italian. Except the very act of walking, the video features the
activities of dancing, stopping, resting, getting lost, following risky
and unofficial paths, and finding the way out along the former Wall
trail.
“My walk along the Berlin Wall was not a predictable performance
artwork. It was filled with intense logos and pathos. It was about
meditating on my slow transformation from an Eastern European subject,
who wanted to assert herself as a freestanding and creative subject in
the West. It was about falling down and getting up because of my
political, linguistic, and cultural unfitness within Italian and
Canadian laws
concerning immigration and citizenship. It
|
|

Kinga Araya:
Former Refugee Camp, Rome, August 2008
was about the
un-measurable weight of living twenty years in the shadow of the iron
curtain and twenty years in the West.” (from “Ten Steps”, video, 2009).
– The performance project was made possible with the support of ICI Institute for
Cultural Inquiry in Berlin. Thanks to the Walkers, Paula Brooks
Jawitz, and Rodney Woosley.
See Kinga Araya and curator Svenja Moor in interview
with art-in-berlin.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Birgit
Schlieps: Niagara Falls
1.5. – 31.5.09
Waterfalls are spectacular events
that never fail to fascinate us. Their allure comes from the force of
the incessant flow of water masses, the thundering noise and the fine
misty spray that breaks up the sunlight into a luminous spectrum of
color. Waterfalls are popular nostalgic motifs often found on postcards
and in travel photography. They are also models for copies found in
parks, gardens and public spaces. One example is the 24 meter high
waterfall which was installed around the end of the 19th century in
Victoriapark in the Kreuzberg borough of Berlin. This waterfall is an
enlarged copy of the Wodospad Podgórnej waterfall in the Giant
Mountain Range on the current border between the Czech Republic and
Poland, only a day’s travel away from Berlin. In the visual arts,
waterfalls are not only motifs; they are sources of imagination to be
appropriated, copied and altered. One has only to look at the New
York City Waterfalls installed by the artist Olafur Eliasson last year
to find a spectacular demonstration of how a waterfall can be both a
product of engineering excellence and a wonder of nature at the same
time.
Birgit Schlieps has brought her own adaptation of a waterfall to the
former watchtower in the park Schlesischer Busch in Berlin. She has
installed photographic murals of Niagara Falls on the watchtower’s
interior walls. Schlieps’ artwork is based on a photograph she found by
chance at a flea market in New York City in 1992 in an album of 31
photographs of Niagara Falls. The pictures were taken using a bellows
camera by two brothers who were visiting
the famous waterfalls on the border shared by
the United States
and Canada in 1920. The photo album contains precise details as to
which side of the falls the pictures were taken from and what part of
the waterfalls can be seen in each photograph. The motif on display in
the |
|

General
view of Niagara Falls from Int. Bridge, September 1920 (private
photography, taken by two unknown brothers who worked for the Cunard
Line New York)

Birgit Schlieps: Niagara Falls,
interior view, Photo: Silke Helmerdig
watchtower is a panorama of the
(American) Niagara Falls and the
(Canadian) Horseshoe Falls and was taken
from the International
Suspension Bridge, an ideal standpoint on the border between the two
states, in no man's land.
The motif is rendered in large
pixels arrayed in a multitude of single
points, like the misty spray of a waterfall. The artwork relies on the
viewer’s distance to form an overall image, but the narrow space of the
watchtower dissolves the trompe l’oeil somewhat and turns our attention
toward the
|
|
atmosphere produced by this natural event, the technical
nature of the image and ultimately the question of perception.
Birgit
Schlieps’ is fascinated by this third entity which perception
creates and which she refers to as “trance-like topology”, to quote
Martin Kippenberger. In his text 1984: How
It Really Was, From the
Example of Knokke, Kippenberger describes how
the perception of nature
is based on physical composure: “I squint at the sky. If I look
directly at the sun and then close my eyes, I see an orangey pink glow
with two bluish green circles. I love that, so I squint at the sky.
It’s a psychedelic, low-grade but good.” Birgit Schlieps understands
topology as concrete spatial relations which become an integral part of
different places and realities in our imagination. The waterfall and
the watchtower thus become an imaginary event in which different
temporal and spatial levels merge into one: 1920 Ontario with upstate
New York, where the photo was taken; W 25th St., Ave of the Americas
and Fifth Ave in 1992 New York City, where Schlieps found the photo
album; and finally the current location and time of Schlesischer Busch,
Berlin, 2009.
On the watchtower’s exterior
Schlieps installed wooden scaffolding much
like the ones used in stage design. The scaffolding undermines the
building’s appearance of stability and permanence. It is a sculptural
intervention that transforms the watchtower into the temporary
construction of a reality that can be taken apart at any time.
Political borders are also imaginary; they are abstract places emerging
only where different spatial and temporal events overlap. By projecting
the image of a border-crossing waterfall onto the watchtower’s physical
structure, Birgit Schlieps makes this process visible.
The Niagara Falls exhibition was made possible with generous support
from Lutz Alder and Kulturamt Treptow-Köpenick.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
LÜ 2008
Christine Berndt: Opera
Sculpture "Dorle"
8.5.–8.6.08
in conjunction with
Helmut
Oehring (composition) and Natalia
Pschenitschnikowa (vocals/recorder)
as well as Torsten Ottersberg (GOGH sound production)

Christine Berndt: Opera
sculpture"Dorle", "Wir waren auch fröhlich", installation in the
ground floor, 15 min
Taking the former
watch tower in the “Schlesischer Busch” in Berlin Treptow-Koepenick as
the medium, the artist Christine Berndt developed the opera sculpture
“Dorle”. The project, in conjunction with the composer Helmut Oehring
and the singer Natalia Pschenitschnikowa, came to life staging GDR
history as a conjunction of documentary, contemporary music and
architectural intervention. Starting point is the watch tower as a
relic and architectural witness of the GDR regime. It forms the
framework for the biography of “Dorle”, a woman whose family history
paradigmatically retells German history.
The
multimedia exhibition refers to “Dorle’s” life on three levels and in
this way follows the given vertical structure and architecture of the
watch tower: On the first floor the
|
*
|
video installation “Propaganda”
with excerpts from the German
Wochenschau, newsreel broadcasts, in the time between 1942 to 1945
refers to the Second World War, which “Dorle’s” father, a general in
the German Wehrmacht experienced in Stalingrad. This is the backdrop to
“Dorle’s” family history. Although these years are shaped by the war,
the choice is restricted to everyday and seemingly insignificant
occurrences which by being staged in a rather propagandist manner are
just as much part of the collective subconscious or awareness as are
the representative pictures and images of war of that time.
On the second windowless floor a surrounding text encircles the
visitor. This represents excerpts from “Dorle’s” diary which tell of
“Dorle’s” attempted escape from the GDR, her following imprisonment and
lastly her position as an unofficial employee of the Stasi.
The
visitor is included in this torturing self assessment and self
questioning, which “Dorle” conducts after the demise of the GDR and
until her death with increasing intensity. – The so called Freiwache,
an open space, on the top floor is filled with the

Christine Berndt:
Opernskulptur "Dorle", untilted (excerpts from "Dorle's" diary),
installation at first floor, 45 min |
**
|

Christine Berndt: Opera
sculpture"Dorle", first release
mono song of
“Dorle”. The libretto lasting 20 minutes, a composition by Helmut
Oehring, varies excerpts
from the diaries. By transposing these diary excerpts into song,
Natalia Pschentschnikowa, “Dorles” conflict is brought into our
awareness and attains present significance. In this tripartite
installation, this is the element with the most immediate impact on the
viewer.
The composition was performed live only once to celebrate the opening
of the exhibition. On the evening of May 6th 2008 the watch tower
turned into a closed shell which was enclosed by the singer and the
instrumentalist in place of “Dorle”. Four surveillance cameras recorded
the happening inside the building and project the solo performance onto
the outer layer of the building while the instrument and the voice were
transmitted to the outside via amplifiers, through the illumination of
the projectors and the emerging instrumental and voice the outer walls
of the watch tower dissolved.
With the friendly support of Kunstfonds Bonn, Köstritzer
Schwarzbierbrauerei, Hypo-Kulturstiftung München, and Kulturamt
Treptow-Köpenick. |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
LÜ 2007
Ulrike
Kuschel: This Wall
3.8.
- 30.9.07
How important is an individual
opinion? What kind of significance has a document? How does the
design of a document, the way in which it is presented, influence its
content?
The works of the Berlin artist Ulrike
Kuschel can be seen as works in analysing the significance of the
documentary. At the former border watch tower at Schlesischer Busch,
she realised a two-piece work in which she uses the benchmark data of
13th August 1961 and 20th March 2007 to define margins of the history
of the Berlin Wall. While the visitor looks out from the second floor
into the park, the former border strip, the empty observation room is
filling with voices. These voices are reactions on the wall building
and opinions of unnamed citizens, collected in August/September 1961 by
local SED authorities in order to evaluate the public opinion and to
prepare possible adequate measures. Ulrike Kuschel selected some of
these transcribed statements from the “Situational Reports from the
Borroughs” and arranged for these short sentences to be spoken on tape
anew. In such a way communicated two times, they now get into the ears
of the visitiors at the watchtower.
“Why don’t you hold elections? Elections would show what the population
thinks.” “I’d rather eat kangaroo meat than become a bolshevist.“ “How
will the colleagues from the outskirts get back home?“ – Dialects,
colloquial language and context-oriented speech were maintained in the
transcription.
Hence, the statements kept their original expression while the sound of
the voices
|
**
|
added to their current
presence. The six minutes long audio
installation called “Things will be even better now – August 1961“
becomes a filter that influences the perception of the watchtower and
its environment.
On the mezzanine floor, six enlarged newspaper pages dated 20th March
2007 are displayed in a rather sober and museum-like manner. The day
before the Berlin Superior Court of Justice revoked the provisional
injunction of the Berlin District Court against the distribution of the
book “Deutsche Gerechtigkeit”, in which the author, Roman Grafe,
criticallly disputes the insufficient trials of the Berlin Wall
Shootings. This revoked ban resulted from a law case of a former
political officer who was deployed in the Border Regiment No. 33, i.e.
at the border section called “Schlesischer Busch”. In the six
newspapers that Ulrike Kuschel assembled and arranged for her
installation “20th (19th) March 2007, German Justice (Deutsche
Gerechtigkeit)” this incident is discussed from different perspectives
and different weighings. Her decision not only to present the specific
articles but to display the complete newspaper pages leads to the
effect that the described incident will also be perceived within the
context of the news coverage of everday politics.
How does the design of a document, the way in which it is presented,
influence its content? The exhibition “This Wall” tries to
re-center
the awareness of the watchtower as a part of the Berlin Wall, built for
political reasons and with severe consequences for the people in the
GDR. For that reason, Ulrike Kuschel decided to imitate the design of
historical-political exhibitions but, at the |
*
|

Ulrike
Kuschel: 20. (19.) März 2007, Deutsche Gerechtigkeit, 2007

Ulrike
Kuschel: „Jetzt wird es noch schöner – August 1961",
Audioinstalltion, 2007
same time, she leaves
their narrow limits and gives way to communicating the presented
incidents from a subjective perspective.
Press: Interview with Ulrike
Kuschel, WDR, August, 13
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Frans
van Lent: Raam
8.6. - 22.7.2007
A step to the
window. A hand shielding the eyes from the light. A long gaze out on
the street. The way back into the room.
These activities take one minute in time; the artist Frans van Lent has
repeated this simple and day-to-day action sixty times. What at first
sight looks like a loop which – as common in artistic videos –
accommodates the viewer with a sixtyfold repetition, then turns out to
be an action unfolding itself in a flow of time.
In contrast to the elusive impression of the same time segment passing
sixty times, you have to realise that there is just time passing. 60
minutes in which things and people will change, history will happen,
the course of the sun will proceed, thoughts may pass, concentration
will decrease, the body will get tired. Actually, the lighting
situation changes in the run of the video. Actually, the gesture of
stepping-to-the-window becomes subject to variations which are
inevitable and subtle at the same time. But this isn't the topic just
as its repetition isn't.
On the first floor of the former border watchtower which is structured
by the iron shutters of the eight loop holes, the video with a window
as main topic is projected onto the wall heading to the West. The
fictitious window seems to open the wall. But there is symbolism
beyond. The wall remains impenetrable and closed just as the world
behind the window glass. Again you find repetition and variation: The
moving of the leaves on the tree, the cars scurrying by which you can
only see indirectly, as a reflection in the window pane of a car parked
in the foreground. - There
is no secret. Even in case you are patient enough to digest – in a kind
of quasi-meditation – the entire 60 |
**
|


minutes of the video, you will not
see anything else but the opening sequence. There is no visible reason
to step to the window. Its repetition turns the gesture into an
autonomous one, just acting self-referentially. Likewise, the position
of the viewer becomes arbitrary and therefore dubious. With him, the
assumed viewer at the window becomes an object of watching. Diverging
from the former assumption, the glance of the viewer is not directed
over the shoulder of a fictitious viewer to an objectified world – the
outside – but is
|
* |


reflected, back into real space and
into the present. It is this
direction of impact that lead to the artist's decision of -
for the time of the exhibition - blocking the way to the upper floor
with its view to the outside in order to obstruct just this view to
what happens on the outside of the watchtower. Here again, the window
(in dutch: raam) opens to the inside.
With the friendly
support of the CBK Dordrecht.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Georg Klein:
turmlaute.2
16.03. - 15.04.2007

|
**
|
Since the
opening at 15 March 2007, the satirical art project "turmlaute.2” of
the sound and media artist Georg
Klein (Berlin) provokes considerable irritations and confusion in
the public and among visitors. The pretty convincing performance of the
European Boder Watch Organisation is effected by running a professional
Website
and awide distribution of realistic and all-to-true invitations. These
mails offer to all EU citizens the opportunity to survey the European
Borders by registering as a web patrol. An offer which has been taken
seriously in many cases and has been commented accordingly. Many of
these comments as well as the first web patrol registrations are
documented in the “book of comments” which is displayed at the
installation. The installation itself consists of three visually and
acoustically designed interior rooms which all are pervaded with dense
and intense sound structures as well as some interventions in the outer
space:
In the ground floor: reception/registration by the European Border
Watch
Organisation (EUBW); 1st floor: showroom with six
loophole-webcam-screens, camp bed, and telephone; 2cd floor:
green, acoustic controlroom with interactive surveillance technique and
the voice of a border guard; roof: loud speaker and green
lighting und grün leuchtender searchlight.
|
*
|

Georg Klein: turmlaute.2
Become a Webpatrol!
Further information about the European
Boder Watch Organisation
Press: Deutschlandfunk,
5.4.07
A project by KlangQuadrat
– office for sound and media art berlin, assistance by Amrei Buchholz
(PR), Marina Szimkowski (visitors care), and Alf Dobbert (komraum), in
Kooperation mit MaerzMusik/Berliner
Festspiele und Kunstfabrik am Flutgraben e.V. und in
freundlicher Zusammenarbeit mit Kulturamt Bezirksamt
Treptow-Köpenick
Berlin.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
LÜ 2006
Roland Boden/Institut fuer
Subreale Urbanistik: Chaotic Magnetic Vortices
1.
- 29.10.2006
Recently,
there have been repeated reports of strange occurrences of heat and
light in the area of Schlesischer Busch, the area between what today is
called Puschkinstraße and Jordanstraße, and between
Flutgraben and Bouchéstraße in Berlin Treptow. It is said
that metal objects heat up abnormally, sometimes all the way to
glowing, and incidents of lightning-like discharges and a grumbling and
booming that seemingly comes from the ground are reported. These
occurrences happen only very rarely and irregularly, and usually
do not last long.
A correlation with meteorological or atmospheric causes can definitely
be ruled out. The cause of these occurrences clearly lies in the centre
of the earth. Since these phenomena are especially linked to strong
magnetic field fluctuations, we must assume a magnetic anomaly, for
which we have the term of chaotic magnetic vortex, a term controversial
among experts since 1922. What is assumed here is a geologically
not explicable Ferrite vein of magnetite, which is possibly caused by a
gigantic deposit of dead magnetotactic bacteria whose body contains a
mineral which these organisms use for orientation in the earth’s
magnetic field. This massing leads, when initialised in the sense of a
vertical clumping, to an extremely strong short-term unbalance in the
earth’s magnetic field. When such a magnetic eruption happens,
especially iron objects in the area of influence heat up very strongly,
in single cases it can even lead to flash-like evaporations.
People with a disposition for such occurrences can even in a greater
distance perceive so-called magnetophosphenes.
In this context, several occurrences from the older and more recent
past now appear in a different light. Undoubtedly the oldest occurrence
is the mysterious demise of a Mongolian group of fighters after the
battle of Liegnitz in Silesia in April 1241. A Mongolian division under
the leadership of Kaidu Khan had beaten the united German-Polish army
of knights and now
threatened to overrun all of central Europe. To this purpose, the
Mongolians sent large mounted units for exploration to the north and
west. One of these units disappeared inexplicably in summer 1241 near
the city of Cölln at the bank of the river Spree. - Ascanian
chronicles
speak of the direct intervention of the Saviour, a Chinese scribe
reports a devilish fire on the armours of the riders, and flashes from
their weapons, killing a majority of the men; the remaining ones fled
in a panic. This incident is possibly one of the reasons for the
seemingly causeless retreat of Batu Khan’s victorious army, without
which Europe would probably have become a Mongolian province. |
**
|

At the end of the nineteenth century, an event happened at the Jordan
chemical factory next to the area under discussion. Several
wrought-iron kettles for the production of aniline in hall IV, located
next to Schlesischer Busch, without discernable reason, heated up to
incandescence. A great explosion happened, causing injuries to several
workers. Since it was suspected that agents from the Russian secret
police were behind this, the event even had an effect on the
“three-emperor meeting” that took place in September of that year.
A further documented incidence took place 95 years later. At the tower
built by the border troops of the GDR in that area in the late 1970s,
fire broke out, ammunition exploded, and numerous shots were fired. In
the west, it was assumed that a failed attempt to break through the
border had occurred, and the GDR leadership did not usually comment on
events like that. But as a witness, the then sergeant of the GDR border
troops Dollmeier reports today, there had not been an attempt to escape
at that time. For “inexplicable reasons”, suddenly the barrels of some
of the machine guns Kalashnikov AK 47, located in the weapon
storage
of the tower heated up extremely, the wooden gun rack caught fire, and
two sergeants were slightly injured as a result of these events. Later,
after the Ministry for State Security had investigated the case
intensively, it classified it as a perfidious |
*
|
attack by the
class
enemy, to be countered with heightened watchfulness. Internally, a
breach of order 30/74, i.e. alcohol abuse during service, was assumed.
The conclusion seems obvious that in all cases, historically so far
apart, chaotic magnetic vortices were the cause of the incidents. This
could possibly also explain the fact that beginning in 1961, in the
border area Schlesischer Busch there was an increased frequency of
firearm use that cannot be explained with the terrain alone. Possibly,
border guards invented afterwards so-called border violations as a
cover to explain inexplicable and not very believable stories of shots
that went off by themselves.
It is also likely that the choice of the site for building a watchtower
was not accidental. Today we know that the head of the pioneer division
of the border regiment 33, colonel Sturm, who was responsible for
the
construction of the command tower, was a passionate adherent of various
esoteric practices who chose the site for buildings personally
with
the aid of a dowsing rod to determine energy fields.
However, according to statements by witnesses, already in the 1920s the
Thule-Gesellschaft and in the early 1940 the SS-Waffenhauptamt
undertook experiments that suggest that the phenomenon was known at
that time, and that apparently attempts were made to make it usable for
the development of weapon technology. We only want to mention the
magnetic ray gun “Odin 2”, with the aid of which allied bomb attacks
were supposed to be warded of, but which was never actually built.
The greatest mystery about the phenomenon is the question of the
initialisation of the vortices, that is, when and how such a magnetic
anomaly occurs. Earlier suspicions about the influence of the Coriolis
effect, the intensity of sunspots, or other physical extraterrestrial
factors apparently cannot be confirmed.
Bit is it obviously possible to cause outbreaks of smaller intensity
with the aid of a so-called phase resonance applicator. According to
reports, a similar instrument was also used in the 1920s. It consists
of electromagnetic spools in a certain order that produce an
alternating magnetic field, which at a certain frequency can lead to a
resonant vortex. Strangely, instruments that were subjected to
sanctification by the church yielded much better results. Enquiries
about this to the Lutheran Church Berlin-Brandenburg unfortunately
remained unanswered so far. Possibly, information about the phenomena
described is still regarded as so explosive that every attempt is made
to keep it secret to this day.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Tina Born: Pavillon
Nocturne
7. -
29.9.2006
For the windowless room, simply equipped with
loopholes, on the first floor of the former border watchtower, Tina
Born has designed a crystalline body, an irregular dodecahedron with a
smooth, shiny surface, which does reveal nothing about its inner
nature.

Tina Born:
Pavillon Nocturne (sketch), 2006
In a narrow room its presence causes
questions, first of all, how it got there. With its size the body is
too big for the openings, through which one enters the room. The hard
mirroring black of its surfaces, that reflect |
**
|

Tina Born:
Pavillon Nocturne, 2006, Photo: air
art log
the light, not only gives it the appearance of
a foreign body, but also adds
an aura of dormant power to
it, capable of hurting the skin of its surrounding architecture with
its sharp edges. Thus the form not only irritates the observer, it also
personates an irritation of the architecture, similar to a painful
embedding, crystalline form, which matures in an organism until it
causes, now grown, constant friction and pain, even leading possibly to
the collapse of its environment.
In its elusive form, on one hand like nature, on the other the matter
of complex mathematic calculations and scientific specs, the
dodecahedron always had a strong appeal with human beings (has exerted
a strong fascination on human beings). The associations, that are
created by the
polyhedron, made of twelve pentagons, were and are versatile. There are
famous pieces of evidence in art history, for instance Dürer’s
copperplate „Melencholia I“ (1514), various drawings by M.C. Escher or
Salvador Dalí’s paintings „Das letzte Abendmahl“. In the 20th
century
it spooked as magical stone of
|
*
|
mostly
extraterrestrial origin through
science fiction literature and movies. All occurrences have in common
the fascination for a still mysterious body, which for Platon
represents as fifth platonic body the universe. In 2003 a French –
American research team made the case,
that the form of outer space would equate to a closed dodecahedron, and
thus gave actuality to the theory of the antique scientist – even
though the theory could not be proved so far.
In the tower the spacial narrowness forces the visitor to draw near the
black body. The approach is inevitable. Inevitable as well is that the
smooth surfaces play around with its mirror image. This factor is to be
understood as direct iconographic acquisition: Dürer’s famous
dodecahedron in „Melencholia I“ contained a secret, which was only
revealed in the early thirties. That was when art historians discovered
in a light shadow on one of his surfaces an image, perhaps a potrait of
Dürer. Giacometti reverted to this discovery, when in 1934 he too
created a dodecahedron-form with the bronze „Der Kubus“, in which he
engraved a flat, almost invisible self-portrait. The sculpture, which
he also gave the title „Pavillon Nocturne“, shows a perplexing spatial
understanding, in which the small form is simultaneously inside and
outside, excluding and including, head and space.
With the title „Pavillon Nocturne“ Born plays with the dual
interpretation: the reference to Giacometti’s work and the possibility,
to observe the dark past of the watchtower, which is discharged from
its former function and surrounded by a park scenery, as "nocturnal
pavilion".
Press: Interview
Svenja Moor von air art log |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Dave
Allen: One Way, Another
Way,
Then Any Other Way
10.8.
- 3.9.2006
Under five bars on a
single musical stave, with 25 annotated numbered notes, there are a
brief set of directions for the musicians: “Read from the left to the
right, playing the notes as follows: 1, 1-2, 1-2-3, 1-2-3-4 etc. When
you have reached note 25, play the whole melody once again and then
begin subtracting notes from the beginning: 2-…25, 3-…-25, 4-…-25, …
22-23-24-25, 23-24-25, 24-25, 25. Hold the last note until everybody
has reached it, then begin an improvisation …”
Dave Allen’s exhibition “One Way, Another Way, Then Any Other Way” in
the former Wachturm is based upon the five bar intro of the „Wouldn’t
It Be Nice“ by the Beach Boys. The seminal, opening song from the
legendary “Pet Sounds” album tells the story of two lovers who dream of
never having to part again. Utilising the additive method described
above the progression of the famous intro sequence is broken apart
leaving the disjointed
elements of the melody. The end result of this minimalist treatment is
a novel and highly graphic sequential structure. The compositional
formula quotes Frederic Rzewski (*1938), one of the most important and
influential American composers and performers of the 20th Century.
The |
**
|
|
*
|
continual exploration of improvisation and collective
collaboration as a process has been a
central part of his work output, as a
composer and as a performer with Musica Elletronica Viva. He is often
described as an overtly political composer, in writing pieces derived
from Chilean protest songs or the letters of an inmate of Attica State
Prison in the U.S.
Dave Allen’s transference of Rzewski’s additive melodic formula to the
song of the Beach Boys is a discerning, yet fitting straight
transformation of content and form of the two seemingly separate
entities – as the convergence of the motifs and their later separation
is realised during the progression of the piece. The melody gradually
draws nearer its origin
and source, it is played through completely (1-…-25), and then it will
once more unravel itself. There is also the possibility for the
individual instruments to merge and diverge, as the piece allows the
musicians to get it together and lose the place. The instructions
continue: “Always play loud, never stop or falter, stay together as
long as you can, but if you get lost, stay lost, do not try to find
your way back into the fold.”
In the make up of a classic rock band – guitars, bass and drums – Dave
Allen and The Astrid Marschall Band will perform the Beach Boys
notation in Allen’s re-arranged sequence on 10th August at the Wachturm. |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
raumlabor_berlin:
Wohnen im Turm. Bauvorhaben: Wohnanlage Schlesischer Busch
8.06.
- 30.7.2006
With the project
“Living in the Tower. Building Intention: Housing Estate Schlesischer
Busch” records the group of architects raumlabor_berlin for eight weeks the former border watch
tower in Schlesischer Busch as part of the series “Letzte
Überprüfung”. Starting point is the border watch tower with
ist functional architecture, ist history and relevant regards. As so
called leadership point the border watch tower in Schlesischer Busch
fulfilled a special function in the system of the Berlin Wall. 18
subordinate watch towers were guided, and the electronic border
security systems controlled, from here.

raumlabor_berlin:
Wohnen im Turm, 2006
Since the downfall of the Wall there is a space which has lost its
function, running through the new resp. old middle of what is now one
city - Berlin. After the usage of almost 30 years there has developed a
vaccuum along this stripe of 44 kilometres length between front and
hinterland wall, which is hardly tolerable for parts of the
|
**
|
public.
Others saw in this unique
emptiness in the middle of a metropolis a breeding ground for temporary
and continual urban uses. While some wished for the fast
joining together of the city and the healing of it’s wounds, others
felt regrets because of the disappearance of traces of history.
At Schlesischer
Busch there is only the watch tower left to inform the
unknowing ones about the by-gone story of the public area which is now
a park. Nearby, at the Heidelberger Straße, the district border
between
Treptow and Neukölln, the youth circus Kabuwazi and a discount
store of
Plus have established. A big top and a supermarket hall, usually
building types of the temporary you would find rather in suburbs, give
the former wall stripe the character of the periphery.
The project “Living in the Tower” draws the attention to this
perception. The watch tower, which is under preservation order, as the
most prominent relic of the Berlin Wall in Berlin-Treptow, is
liberalised for the plan game to be changed into an ordinary building
type of the periphery - the detached house.
In the first phase from 8th June until 5th July, Francesco Apuzzo and
Axel Timm from raumlabor_berlin will shift their planning office to the
watch tower, and work on situations of changed usage in scetches and
models together with visitors of the exhibition as potential “clients”.
A building sign at Puschkinallee not only informs about the project and
“wins” visitors of the exhibition as participants for the plan game,
but also a selected building intention is presented here weekly. During
the second
phase from 6th July until 30th July the created drafts will be
exhibited in the tower.
Press: RBB-Kulturradio,
6.7.06
|
*
|

Watchtower model,
Photo: C. Diribas

Watchtower models,
Photo: C. Diribas
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Sofia
Hultén: Events With
Unknown Outcome, 4. -
28.5.2006

Sofia
Hultén: Events
With Unknown Outcome, installation view
|
**
|
In the frontier watchtower
Sofia Hultén presents a four-part video as a result of her
observations in the adjoining park. Four monitors extend the panopticon
of the view below on the second floor of the former watchtower. In the
frames of the windows and monitors, present blends with past, real with
staged. The viewer cannot withdraw from the perspective, becomes an
observer, beegins to speculate on the significance of the happenings in
the park. In the end the same applies to observations and incidents in
the park: They are events with unknown outcome.
|
*
|

Sofia
Hultén:
Events With Unknown Outcome, 2006 (Detail), Photos: S. Hultén
|
|
|
 |
|
|
The projects in 2006
were made possible by the project grant of the Senatsverwaltung
für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
LÜ
2005
Ines
Tartler: open
1.09. –
9.10.2005
The former watchtower in the Schlesischer Busch is equipped with
sixteen windows and eight arrow slits. Now Ines
Tartler has unblocked the building with a
sparing gesture by opening the casements in the so called Freiwache
[watch below] and by loosing the cotters in the middle floor of the
watchtower. Now the wind enters the building. During the day the
warmth, by night the cold comes in. The sounds from the surrounding
park as well as the noises from the street come nearer. And the shadows
start dancing on the walls. One may discover the swinging leaves of the
old oaks or some discrete cars passing the walls – head first, because
of the camera obscura effect.

Ines
Tartler: open, 2005, Photos: Ines Tartler
|
**
|
There are not only these images of the outside world
falling under
special conditions into the watchtower. The whole building has become
an amplifier, accumulating and concentrating the optical, haptic and
acoustic impulses from outside, transmitting them to the visitor
inside. The blank rooms of the watchtower direct the visitors attention
to the architecture, the senses are sharpened. In this attention one
may find a parallel between the current visitor on the one hand and the
border guard from the past on the other hand. But you won’t be able to
adopt the observers position in the watch below, even so the
architecture still seems to impose it upon you, since now the glances
cross the opened windows in both directions. The former constitutive
situation of the secure persons inside and the observed outside is
reversed – at least for a moment.
Ines Tartler chose a placative gesture, particularly if the sun is
shining, but it is not a naïve one. From where the gaze is now
going
westward through the arrow slits to the bushes bordering the river
Flutgraben, in former time it would have been stopped by the 3,60 m
wall, the so called ‘Letztes Sperrelement’ (last blocking device). The
soldiers could have never seen sunbathing visitors within the range of
vision. Their bored, acccording to the inscriptions in the reveals,
sometimes even wishful look, never followed the line of cars, which is
now enlivening the former dead-end street. |
*
|


Through the apertures, the
ventilation slots, the arrow slits, the doors, and windows the
presence, with it’s different appearances, enters the watchtower,
leaving a mark by the visitor – contradictory or harmonious, intensive
or fleeting.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Shahram
Entekhabi: kilid
14.7.
– 21.08.2005

Shahram
Entekhabi: kilid, 2005

Shahram Entekhabi:
kilid, interior view, 2005
„Security
advice: Please watch out for abandoned objects and luggage in trains
and at platforms. Use the SOS Telephone to inform us.“ This line
accompanies the current programme of the “Berliner Fenster”, the public
transportation TV of the capital’s subways, since the bomb attacks in
London
|
**
|
have happened. It is the subtitle of commercials, stupid celebrity news and
recommendations for mostly third-class events and cooking recipes. The
„Berliner Fenster“: involuntary medium of a cynic realism between murder, threat, kitsch, war, security
advices, infotainment and advertisement.
The safety measures remind us of opening an umbrella after everybody
has gotten wet already. Who is shooting or bombing, when, and why? How
is ideology legitimated? How does one decline fundamentalism? What is
the rationale for national security?
At the former physic border of
the allied forces of
the cold war, the former inter-German dividing line of two
socially
organised ideologies, and one of the last watchtowers of the former GDR
in Berlin, is where the work „kilid“ of the artist Shahram
Entekhabi,
born in Iran, is shining. A six meter-long key (kilid, key in English),
made of aluminium and equipped with 400 light bulbs, colored in the
colors of the Iranian flag with the image of the tulip of Allah, is
shining over the former border area and marks the current ideological
border, a border that is embattled in a hot and severe war.
Once the one enmity is overcome,
the next one is immediately emerging.
The ideology of Islamic fundamentalism confronts
the ideology of a
hysteric, industrialized Christianity and the societies derived from
it.
Entekhabi’s „kilid“ is also to be understood as a symbol and a
reference to the small plastic keys, handed to children soldiers in the
Iraqi/Iranian war. They were handed to them as the key to the
otherworldly paradise
|
* |
to
equip them also in a ideological way for
martyrdom, before the children were used as human
mine detectors. The
bombs tear up bodies, souls seek refuge in paradise. At the watchtower,
visitors will find countless used original keys, which do not lock or
open any lock anymore. Every visitor may choose one and take it home.
Entekhabi’s work, reminding of
neon advertisement signs, the aesthetics
of fairs and village festivals, casts a new light on the watchtower,
the remains and current symbol of a past, formerly proud,
industrialized security system.
What is more cruel: the development of weapons that can – like in a
computer game - finally be navigated unmanned by the
generation of
Playstation-Maniacs, suggesting a clean war, or the seduction of
children, youngsters, and adults to volunteer as
victims and
weapons? The entry to Allah’s heart is paid as reward.
The industrial and digital weapon technology serve the game of the
weapon industry in its battle for markets, where functionality is
checked in the reality-test of current crisis and war regions. The
fanatic religiousness serves the mullahs to secure their power
interests.
Who is shooting and bombing, when, and why? How is ideology
legitimated? By installing Sharam Entekhabi’s work on the watchtower,
new fields of interpretation and reference for his work as well as for
the tower as historic remains will emerge.
With
the friendly support of THW Treptow-Köpenick and Zumtobel Staff.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Sigalit
Landau: Barbed Hula
19.5. – 10.7.2005
The slow circling hips keep the hula hoop
running. It's weight hits the flesh and leaves indentations and bruises
there. The barbs on it hurt the skin. But the motion keeps going on –
endlessly, monotonously, languorously like the see in the background of
the scene.
The performance „Barbed Hula“ was developed in 2001 as a non-public
act, performed on the beach of the Mediterranian coast nearby Tel Aviv
by the Israeli artist Sigalit Landau. It's a short, but painfull film.
Because the sequence of one and a half minutes is in slow motion and
looped the film becomes endlessly (DVD, 1:53 min, loop). So the
circling of the barbed loop, the confontation of the vulnarable body on
the one and the adamant barbed wire on the other hand comes to the
fore. It seems that the hula is moving of it's own accord because of
the restrained releasing motion of the hips.
Sigalit Landau's performance is more than just a private experiment to
check out her physical limits. One can take it as a
|
**
|
metaphor for
a
crucial border, that depends on the action (and therewith the human
beings) to perpetuate itself. One can take it as a metaphor for the
conflict between Israel and Palestine which lasts for decades. In a
more abstract sense one can take it as a symbol for the experience of
political borders. The reduced, abstract and elementary scenery – the
naked body, the rush of the see, the simple and endless flow – backs
this interpretation.
In the former Watchtower Schlesischer Busch, relict and symbol of the
borderland around West-Berlin, the hula-dancing body sensitize the
perception for the physicalness of it's pure functional architecture.
One becomes aware of the building's emptyness as well as the absence of
the former users. Thus, the idea of the physicalness of a system
arises, a system, which captured itself in an endless circle. There is
a parallel between the way the pan shot from the violated body to the
see alleviates the viewer of the filmed performance and the feeling
that the visitors of the watchtower may have, coming from the dark
mezzanine floor up to the light flooded „Freiwache“ (observing floor).
But the view around the nature of the surrounding park is ambivalent.
|
*
|

Sigalit Landau:
Barbed Hula, 2003
From this perspective the former borderland has
nothing in common with
the park, except some kind of clarity. It's the observer's position
that remained the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Abwehr-Performance-Festival
25./26.8.2007
|
|
|
|
|
Nezaket
Ekici: Nazar
Dressed in a long robe composed of 600 shiny blue
glas amuletts Nezaket
Ekici makes her way through the Kreuzbergian Wrangelstrasse. These
“blue eyes” from Turkey (turkish: nazar) shall protect the bearer and
are said to avert “the evil eye”. But here the artist draws all
glances on her and her dazzling robe of 40 kilos weight. In
consequence, she becomes both: a powerful bearer of the amulett and the
possible victim of these glances. The performance “Nazar” creates an
attractive picture and thereby thematises the paradoxes of defense.
“Nazar” was first per formed in Istanbul in 2005.
|
|
Duo Stoll &
Wachall: Des-Infektion
The German Medical Handbook defines disinfection as “turning dead or
living material into a state of no longer being infectuous”. In
the name of defense the duo Stoll &
Wachall was engaged to patrol through the “Schlesischer Busch”,
dressed up in protection suits, carrying tanks on their backs. Their
mission: “Disinfection of the park and its visitors, to prevent them
and us against all thinkable infections. By this security measure we
increase both, the general hygenie and the general hysteria. We take
care for all invisible killing cells. We fight back all attacks from
bacteria, germs, and viruses. |
|
Anny und Sibel
Öztürk:
NÖ-Performance
Experience the remake of the legendary Beuys art performance “ja ja ja
ja ja, nee nee nee nee nee”, first performed at the Staatliche
Kunstakademie Düsseldorf 1986! Anny and Sibel Öztürk
meet on the green meadow where they skillfully practice what our fellow
citizens of turkish origin like to do in the public greens of Berlin:
they have a picnic. And what are they doing besides having a picnic in
the public green of Berlin? Right: they do the Joseph Beuys ! In
accordance with the historical original, the sisters are taking turns
in the acts of confirmation and negation while in their perfor
mance they substitute the german “nee” (no) by the more emphatic
“nö”.
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Ona Tav: The
Well-Spring Body
You are wandering through a park. On one of its trees you see a white
knight’s armour tied to its stem and two of its branches. Tears of red
wine are running down from the eyeholes, slashing the white body on its
way down to the feet into a basin so to satisfy one’s thirst. Day after
day the tree keeps on standing. The cloud is the ceiling of the skies
and we are drinking from its sweat. We dunk our cup into these tears of
wine so that in our throat they will turn into fire and we can await
the tears from the skies. There is no soul without a world and no tears
without a soul. He dressed up in metal to prevent the world from pain
but he couldn’t stop his own crying.
|
|
Nevin
Aladag: Raise The Roof
Nevin Aladag stages a sort of dance on the roof of
the Kunstfabrik. Four dancers move to the beats of four different
pieces of music which the audience will not hear but only learn titles
and length. Instead, they hear the amplified sound of kitten heels
piercing through the prepared dance floor.This dance on the roof –
where in earlier times GDR border soldiers patrolled – is not a mutual
dance. In twofold isolation, marked-off from each other and from the
audience, the gestures of attraction and defense constituted in this
dance have lost all points of reference.
|
|
Shahram
Entekhabi/Becky Ofek:
Boxing Box
My dearest sport fans, the shadow lighted area is filled with the
poisoned dirty smell of no return. This is not about fighting, this is
about living, my dear friends. Come and see the warm aggressed blood of
2 dangerous fools exploding like a Russian nuclear power sta tion in an
unforgettable century fight between the sexes. Woman versus Man, Bitch
versus Bastard. Be witness of the battling Cyclops high up in the sky,
fighting their gender pain away. Bäng bäng buff. |
Abwehr is a project by
Shahram Entekhabi and
Svenja Moor
in co-operation with
Kunstfabrik am Flutgraben e.V. and
with the friendly support of the Regierender Bürgermeister
von Berlin, Senatskanzlei – Kulturelle Angelegenheiten |

|
Fotos
oben mitte, unten links/mitte: Lars Frers, Lizenz: CC-BY-SA-NC
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Imprint |
|
|
|
|
Flutgraben
e.V.
Am Flutgraben 3
12435 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 53 21 96 58
E-Mail: info [ett] flutgraben [punkt] org
|
**
|
Team
LÜ 2005: Sirid Amsel, Mari Brellochs, Elke Frietsch, Svenja Moor
Team LÜ 2006: Svenja Moor, Ines Tartler
Team LÜ 2007ff: Svenja Moor, Birgit Neumann (staff)
|
*
|
© 2009.
All rights reserved: Flutgraben e.V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letzte
Überprüfung im Schlesischen Busch ia a project by Flutgraben e.V.,
with the friendly support of the Bezirksamt Treptow-Köpenick von
Berlin
Treptow-Köpenick, Abteilung Umwelt, Grün und
Immobilienwirtschaft, awarded with the quality label Berliner Mauer of
the Senatskanzlei
Berlin. Member of network Mauerfall09.
|

|
| |
|
|
|
|
|